Archive for May, 2011

San Jose City Council imposes 10 percent pay cuts on four unions

Posted: 05/31/2011 02:16:35 PM PDT

Updated: 05/31/2011 07:58:05 PM PDT

 

//

// 0){ document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.width = requestedWidth + “px”; document.getElementById(‘articleViewerGroup’).style.margin = “0px 0px 10px 10px”; }
// ]]>On an 8-3 vote that signaled growing impatience with labor battles in the face of a fiscal crisis, the San Jose City Council on Tuesday imposed 10 percent pay and benefit cuts on four unions representing more than half the city’s workforce.

The unions had resisted across-the-board concession requests that six other unions had accepted to reduce layoffs as city officials try to close a $115 million budget deficit.

Labor leaders characterized the council vote as a “heavy-handed” power grab. And council members said they were making plans in case workers strike.

Complete article found at: http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-government/ci_18176715

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunnyvale in planning stages for 100th anniversary celebration

By Alia Wilson, Sunnyvale Sun

awilson@community-newspapers.com

Posted: 05/26/2011 03:37:16 PM PDT

Updated: 05/26/2011 03:48:52 PM PDT

 

Plans for the biggest celebration Sunnyvale has ever seen are already under way to mark the city’s 100th birthday in 2012.

Incorporated in 1912, the city and its mild climate and fertile soil made for a farmer’s paradise. A century later, thousands continue to enjoy the ideal California weather. From the Valley of Heart’s Delight to the Heart of Silicon Valley, Sunnyvale has held on to a rich part of Santa Clara County history.

Complete article found at: http://www.mercurynews.com/sunnyvale/ci_18148315

Enhanced by Zemanta

Beach-pollution report says most Bay Area beaches OK in dry weather

Posted: 05/25/2011 05:12:09 PM PDT

Updated: 05/25/2011 05:12:10 PM PDT

 

SAN FRANCISCO — Swimmers, surfers and families heading to the Bay Area’s urban beaches won’t be exposed to unhealthy bacteria this summer — with some notable exceptions, according to an environmental group that tracks the health of California’s shoreline.

Heal the Bay’s annual Beach Report Card, released Wednesday, gave an “A” grade to 90 percent of Bay Area oceanside beaches for the absence of potentially harmful bacteria such as fecal coliform and E. coli in summer months.

Complete article found at: http://www.mercurynews.com/san-mateo-county/ci_18139902

Enhanced by Zemanta

Vietnamese leaders celebrate Little Saigon monument in San Jose

By John Woolfolk
jwoolfolk@mercurynews.com

Posted: 05/20/2011 02:48:27 PM PDT
Updated: 05/20/2011 09:06:28 PM PDT
Click photo to enlarge
Pictured is the permanent marker to be… (Handout photo, Little Saigon San Jose Foundation)«1234»It has been there since March but sits little noticed, wrapped in black plastic in the center divide of Story Road near the Highway 101 overpass.

But on Saturday, San Jose’s Vietnamese community triumphantly will unveil what they won three years ago after months of massive demonstrations and a hunger strike at City Hall: a permanent sign welcoming visitors to “Little Saigon.”

“This is a very big deal to our community,” said Barry Do, spokesman for the Little Saigon San Jose Foundation, which raised private donations to create the $10,000 monument and install it in the city-owned median strip.

As many as 2,000 onlookers are expected to attend the ceremony scheduled for 11 a.m. at Story Road and Via Ferrari.

Notably, two people who won’t be there: Mayor Chuck Reed and Councilwoman Madison Nguyen, the council’s first and only Vietnamese member who was almost run out of office over the name “Little Saigon.”

The saga began in 2007 as a feel-good city gesture to recognize its vibrant Vietnamese community. San Jose has more Vietnamese residents than any California city, at more than 100,000 or about a tenth of its population.

The idea was to have an official designation for the strip of Vietnamese markets, eateries, salons and shops lining Story Road in the city’s central district. But a dispute over the name soon erupted into one of the biggest controversies to besiege City Hall in years.

Most of the Vietnamese community’s leaders and elders favored “Little Saigon,” an homage to the former capital of their homeland that fell to communist forces in 1975 and a term that designates other Vietnamese enclaves in cities coast to coast.

Nguyen and other city leaders voted in November 2007 to call it “Saigon Business District” instead. Nguyen, who represents the Story Road area, said not everyone liked “Little Saigon” and felt her recommendation was a more inclusive compromise.

But Vietnamese leaders savaged her for such apostasy, as well as Reed, who stood by Nguyen through months of noisy demonstrations at City Hall. Hundreds packed the council chambers in protest of what they saw as an affront to the majority’s will to have “Little Saigon.”

Dozens marched in the rain outside the glass rotunda as anti-communist activist Ly Tong starved himself in a tent at the foot of the council’s office tower. A lawsuit accused Nguyen and other city officials of thwarting state open-meeting laws to lock down votes against “Little Saigon.”

The uproar didn’t subside until March 2008. The City Council first unanimously rescinded the “Saigon Business District” designation. Then a few weeks later, after Tong was hospitalized over a fainting
View Little Saigon marker in a larger mapspell, Reed and other city leaders struck a deal with him and Vietnamese protesters to allow privately funded “Little Saigon” signs.

After community meetings on the design, privately funded colorful banners went up along a mile-long stretch of Story Road in October 2008 proclaiming it “Little Saigon” in a ceremony attended by Vietnamese activists and local officials. Those banners were assumed to be temporary while community leaders raised money for a permanent monument. But Do said they will remain as well.

“The city never officially recognized the name,” Do said, “but allowed us to turn it into a reality.”

Divisions over “Little Saigon” still simmer. Activists launched a campaign to recall Nguyen and mounted an unsuccessful challenge to her re-election.

But Nguyen is pointedly not invited to Saturday’s ceremony, which is expected to include San Jose council members Kansen Chu, Ash Kalra, Sam Liccardo and Xavier Campos, Assemblywoman Nora Campos, Supervisor Dave Cortese and Milpitas Vice Mayor Pete McHugh. Do feared Nguyen would be a disruptive presence as many “Little Saigon” supporters feel she has not done enough to mend fences with them.

Nguyen was sick for three days this week and didn’t respond to requests to comment through her office.

Do said he believed Mayor Reed would not attend unless Nguyen was invited. Reed’s spokeswoman wouldn’t discuss the matter. But the mayor said in a statement that he’s “pleased to see the Little Saigon foundation privately raise funds for this monument.

“It is a significant milestone for the Vietnamese-American community in San Jose as they move forward and contribute to our city,” Reed said.

Along Story Road, in a diverse neighborhood with large numbers of Latinos, Filipinos and other non-Vietnamese, many greet the new sign with resigned acceptance. Some privately say that it can hurt your business if you’re not for “Little Saigon.” Others sigh over the divisiveness of ethnic identity.

“It’s all right,” said Ramiro Castillo, who lives in a purple house across the street from the new sign and remembers almost half a century back when there were no Vietnamese in San Jose. “This is going to be their area. Everyone around here will be Vietnamese soon; no more Mexicans, no more black people. But I get along with them pretty good. They’re friendly people.”

Gene Hernandez, who works at a wedding and party store across the street, said he was “on the fence” about the sign, but added: “I’ve got to hand it to them. They’re industrious people, and they get things done.”

Mercury News Research Director Leigh Poitinger contributed to this report. Contact John Woolfolk at 408-975-9346.

 Article found at: http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-government/ci_18106258

Enhanced by Zemanta

Fed considers tighter credit as economy improves

Fed Minutes: Fed debated in April how to tighten credit if inflation persists

ap

Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer, On Wednesday May 18, 2011, 5:56 pm EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve said last month that the economy is gradually improving and began discussing how it would reverse policies adopted during the recession that pumped billions of dollars into the economy.

Some members said the Fed might need to start boosting interest rates this year to guard against inflation. Any effort to tighten credit would lead to higher rates on some mortgages, credit cards and other consumer loans.

Fed policymakers didn’t commit to taking any action at the April 26-27 meeting, according to minutes released Wednesday. But they agreed that if the economy continued its steady growth, the Fed would need to pull back on its massive stimulus programs and take steps to prevent consumer prices from getting out of control.

The officials generally agreed that the first step should be for the central bank to stop reinvesting money earned off its holdings of mortgages and Treasury securities. That’s consistent with comments made by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at a news conference after the April 27 meeting. But that would have only a limited impact on the rates Americans pay on loans.

A majority of participants said the best method for tightening credit would be to lift the federal funds rate, which is now at a record-low near zero. The federal funds rate is the interest banks pay each other on overnight loans. Most Fed officials said they preferred raising that rate before selling mortgage securities from the Fed’s vast portfolio.

Some members thought the Fed would need to start signaling to investors that interest rates would need to rise. A few members believed the Fed might need to boost its key interest rate or start selling some of the assets in its portfolio this year.

The minutes don’t identify what the individual Fed policymakers said.

Economist Chris Rupkey at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ said the Fed could start boosting interest rates near the end of this year. Fed policymakers “are back to talking exit strategy,” he said. But high unemployment at 9 percent could weigh on the economy and delay any tightening into next year, he added.

The Fed’s exit strategy is likely to be more complicated than ever before because of the extraordinary steps the Fed took during and after the recession to prop up the economy.

The Fed’s balance sheet has nearly tripled in the past three years to roughly $2.7 trillion. To counter the 2008 financial crisis and the recession, the Fed launched programs to buy billions of dollars’ worth of mortgage securities and Treasury debt.

Those programs have helped drive down rates on mortgages and other loans and boosted stock prices. However, critics — including some members of the Fed — said the programs also contributed to higher inflation.

Many Fed officials said they preferred a gradual process of selling off its mortgage securities. The goal would be for the Fed’s portfolio to consist entirely of Treasury securities within five years of the start of those sales.

Fed officials didn’t agree on when the central bank would launch its exit strategy.

Bernanke and other Fed officials have predicted that a surge in oil prices would be temporary and would not lead to runaway inflation. Crude has fallen about 11.5 percent since April, when a weak dollar and a rash of international crises pushed oil to two-year highs.

Still, many Fed officials had become more concerned about inflation, the minutes revealed. They worried that oil prices could keep rising and force more companies to boost the prices they charge consumers. Fed officials said they need to monitor inflation closely.

Fed officials also expressed concerns that higher gas prices could lead consumers to spend less on discretionary goods, which would weigh on the economy. They also cited other risks that could restrain U.S. growth, including debt problems in Europe, supply disruptions to U.S. companies stemming from the earthquake in Japan and a failure by Congress to boost the U.S. government’s borrowing authority.

However, some Fed officials said there would need to be a “significant change” in the economic outlook for the Fed to embark on a third Treasury bond-buying program. The Fed is slated to end a $600 billion bond-purchase program on schedule in June. The program was launched in early November when the Fed feared that the economy could ball back into another recession.

This isn’t the first time the Fed has talked about an exit strategy. Bernanke in February last year started laying out a plan about how the Fed would tighten credit when the time was right. But the economy slowed sharply in the spring of 2011 because of the European debt crisis. And, unemployment got stuck at high levels topping 9.5 percent. By November, the Fed was forced to launch a second stimulus program.

Articles found at: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Fed-considers-tighter-credit-apf-426640438.html?x=0

Enhanced by Zemanta