By John Woolfolk
jwoolfolk@mercurynews.com
Posted: 05/20/2011 02:48:27 PM PDT
Updated: 05/20/2011 09:06:28 PM PDT
Click photo to enlarge
Pictured is the permanent marker to be… (Handout photo, Little Saigon San Jose Foundation)«1234»It has been there since March but sits little noticed, wrapped in black plastic in the center divide of Story Road near the Highway 101 overpass.
But on Saturday, San Jose’s Vietnamese community triumphantly will unveil what they won three years ago after months of massive demonstrations and a hunger strike at City Hall: a permanent sign welcoming visitors to “Little Saigon.”
“This is a very big deal to our community,” said Barry Do, spokesman for the Little Saigon San Jose Foundation, which raised private donations to create the $10,000 monument and install it in the city-owned median strip.
As many as 2,000 onlookers are expected to attend the ceremony scheduled for 11 a.m. at Story Road and Via Ferrari.
Notably, two people who won’t be there: Mayor Chuck Reed and Councilwoman Madison Nguyen, the council’s first and only Vietnamese member who was almost run out of office over the name “Little Saigon.”
The saga began in 2007 as a feel-good city gesture to recognize its vibrant Vietnamese community. San Jose has more Vietnamese residents than any California city, at more than 100,000 or about a tenth of its population.
The idea was to have an official designation for the strip of Vietnamese markets, eateries, salons and shops lining Story Road in the city’s central district. But a dispute over the name soon erupted into one of the biggest controversies to besiege City Hall in years.
Most of the Vietnamese community’s leaders and elders favored “Little Saigon,” an homage to the former capital of their homeland that fell to communist forces in 1975 and a term that designates other Vietnamese enclaves in cities coast to coast.
Nguyen and other city leaders voted in November 2007 to call it “Saigon Business District” instead. Nguyen, who represents the Story Road area, said not everyone liked “Little Saigon” and felt her recommendation was a more inclusive compromise.
But Vietnamese leaders savaged her for such apostasy, as well as Reed, who stood by Nguyen through months of noisy demonstrations at City Hall. Hundreds packed the council chambers in protest of what they saw as an affront to the majority’s will to have “Little Saigon.”
Dozens marched in the rain outside the glass rotunda as anti-communist activist Ly Tong starved himself in a tent at the foot of the council’s office tower. A lawsuit accused Nguyen and other city officials of thwarting state open-meeting laws to lock down votes against “Little Saigon.”
The uproar didn’t subside until March 2008. The City Council first unanimously rescinded the “Saigon Business District” designation. Then a few weeks later, after Tong was hospitalized over a fainting
View Little Saigon marker in a larger mapspell, Reed and other city leaders struck a deal with him and Vietnamese protesters to allow privately funded “Little Saigon” signs.
After community meetings on the design, privately funded colorful banners went up along a mile-long stretch of Story Road in October 2008 proclaiming it “Little Saigon” in a ceremony attended by Vietnamese activists and local officials. Those banners were assumed to be temporary while community leaders raised money for a permanent monument. But Do said they will remain as well.
“The city never officially recognized the name,” Do said, “but allowed us to turn it into a reality.”
Divisions over “Little Saigon” still simmer. Activists launched a campaign to recall Nguyen and mounted an unsuccessful challenge to her re-election.
But Nguyen is pointedly not invited to Saturday’s ceremony, which is expected to include San Jose council members Kansen Chu, Ash Kalra, Sam Liccardo and Xavier Campos, Assemblywoman Nora Campos, Supervisor Dave Cortese and Milpitas Vice Mayor Pete McHugh. Do feared Nguyen would be a disruptive presence as many “Little Saigon” supporters feel she has not done enough to mend fences with them.
Nguyen was sick for three days this week and didn’t respond to requests to comment through her office.
Do said he believed Mayor Reed would not attend unless Nguyen was invited. Reed’s spokeswoman wouldn’t discuss the matter. But the mayor said in a statement that he’s “pleased to see the Little Saigon foundation privately raise funds for this monument.
“It is a significant milestone for the Vietnamese-American community in San Jose as they move forward and contribute to our city,” Reed said.
Along Story Road, in a diverse neighborhood with large numbers of Latinos, Filipinos and other non-Vietnamese, many greet the new sign with resigned acceptance. Some privately say that it can hurt your business if you’re not for “Little Saigon.” Others sigh over the divisiveness of ethnic identity.
“It’s all right,” said Ramiro Castillo, who lives in a purple house across the street from the new sign and remembers almost half a century back when there were no Vietnamese in San Jose. “This is going to be their area. Everyone around here will be Vietnamese soon; no more Mexicans, no more black people. But I get along with them pretty good. They’re friendly people.”
Gene Hernandez, who works at a wedding and party store across the street, said he was “on the fence” about the sign, but added: “I’ve got to hand it to them. They’re industrious people, and they get things done.”
Mercury News Research Director Leigh Poitinger contributed to this report. Contact John Woolfolk at 408-975-9346.
Article found at: http://www.mercurynews.com/politics-government/ci_18106258